TakeHomeTax

Minnesota vs Vermont:
Take-Home Pay Comparison

Side-by-side tax comparison between Minnesota (9.85% top rate, graduated) and Vermont (8.75% top rate, graduated). See which state lets you keep more at every salary level, and how cost of living changes the picture.

On a $100K salary
+$715/year
Vermont keeps $715 more per year than Minnesota
Thats $60/month \u00B7 $3,575 over 5 years
Minnesota
State Tax Structure5.35-9.85%
Federal Tax$13,225
FICA (SS + Medicare)$7,650
State + Local Tax$6,402
Total Taxes$27,278
Annual Take-Home$72,723
Monthly Take-Home$6,060
Effective Tax Rate27.3%
Cost of Living Index99
Cost-Adjusted Value$73,457
Vermont Winner
State Tax Structure3.35-8.75%
Federal Tax$13,225
FICA (SS + Medicare)$7,650
State + Local Tax$5,688
Total Taxes$26,563
Annual Take-Home$73,438
Monthly Take-Home$6,120
Effective Tax Rate26.6%
Cost of Living Index105
Cost-Adjusted Value$69,940

Tax Structure: Minnesota vs Vermont

Minnesota uses a graduated income tax (5.35-9.85%) while Vermont has a graduated system (3.35-8.75%). On a $100K salary, Minnesota takes $6,402 in state and local taxes compared to Vermonts $5,688 \u2014 a difference of $715.

Both states use graduated brackets, but Minnesota’s top rate of 9.85% is higher than Vermont’s 8.75%.

Take-Home at Every Salary Level

Vermont wins at 10 out of 10 salary levels tested. The advantage exists but is modest across the income spectrum.

SalaryMinnesotaVermontDifferenceWinner
$40K$31,759$32,045+$286Vermont
$50K$39,154$39,511+$358Vermont
$60K$46,549$46,978+$429Vermont
$75K$56,736$57,272+$536Vermont
$100K$72,723$73,438+$715Vermont
$120K$85,512$86,370+$858Vermont
$150K$104,147$105,220+$1,073Vermont
$200K$136,082$137,512+$1,430Vermont
$250K$167,258$169,045+$1,788Vermont
$300K$196,121$198,266+$2,145Vermont

Cost of Living: Minnesota (99) vs Vermont (105)

Take-home pay only tells part of the story. Minnesota has a cost of living index of 99 while Vermont is at 105 (national average = 100).

The cost of living gap is moderate. After adjustment, $100K has purchasing power of $73,457 in Minnesota vs $69,940 in Vermont. However, Minnesota actually provides better purchasing power despite Vermont’s take-home advantage.

Minnesota \u2014 Cost-Adjusted
$73,457
Purchasing power of $72,723 take-home
Vermont \u2014 Cost-Adjusted
$69,940
Purchasing power of $73,438 take-home

Married Filing Jointly: How It Changes the Comparison

For a single earner at $100K filing jointly, take-home becomes $78,308 in Minnesota and $79,023 in Vermont \u2014 a difference of $715. The gap remains similar regardless of filing status.

Should You Move from Minnesota to Vermont?

On paper, moving from Minnesota to Vermont would save $715/year on a $100K salary, or $3,575 over 5 years. But relocation involves real costs: moving expenses, potentially buying/selling a home, changing jobs, and adjusting to a new community.

At $715/year, the tax difference alone likely isn’t worth relocating for. Other factors — job market, lifestyle, family — should drive the decision. The tax savings are a nice bonus if you’re already considering the move for other reasons.

Explore Each State in Detail

Compare at Specific Salary Levels

$40K
VT saves $286/yr
$45K
VT saves $322/yr
$50K
VT saves $358/yr
$55K
VT saves $393/yr
$60K
VT saves $429/yr
$65K
VT saves $465/yr
$70K
VT saves $501/yr
$75K
VT saves $536/yr
$80K
VT saves $572/yr
$85K
VT saves $608/yr
$90K
VT saves $644/yr
$95K
VT saves $679/yr
$100K
VT saves $715/yr
$110K
VT saves $787/yr
$120K
VT saves $858/yr
$130K
VT saves $930/yr
$140K
VT saves $1,001/yr
$150K
VT saves $1,073/yr
$175K
VT saves $1,251/yr
$200K
VT saves $1,430/yr
$250K
VT saves $1,788/yr
$300K
VT saves $2,145/yr
$400K
VT saves $2,860/yr
$500K
VT saves $3,575/yr
The Take-Home Tax Guide
Weekly tips on reducing your tax burden, state tax changes, and salary negotiation strategies. Free.